In reporting the Zimmerman trial and its outcome in USA, the ABC almost always attaches the descriptor "unarmed" when referring to the unfortunate dead teenager. Yet, he reportedly did serious damage to the head of Zimmerman before being shot. Why does the ABC not employ the same descriptor "unarmed" to the perpetrators of king hit punchers and their victims? Clenched fists it would seem do not equate with being armed by ABC standards. Evoking pathos for the victim at every opportunity is clearly the progressives' PC aim in covering the Zimmerman story.
In reporting the Zimmerman trial and its outcome in USA, the ABC almost always attaches the descriptor "unarmed" when referring to the unfortunate dead teenager. Yet, he reportedly did serious damage to the head of Zimmerman before being shot. Why does the ABC not employ the same descriptor "unarmed" to the perpetrators of king hit punchers and their victims? Clenched fists it would seem do not equate with being armed by ABC standards. Evoking pathos for the victim at every opportunity is clearly the progressives' PC aim in covering the Zimmerman story.
ReplyDelete