Gerard Henderson in today's Australian comments on ABC's coverage of the Islamic terrorist attacks in Paris.
ABC must confront the inconvenient truth about Islamic terrorism SO Paris is the most recent city to
experience a dose of what Monash University academic and former ABC
Radio National presenter Waleed Aly has termed a “perpetual irritant”.
However, to everyday Parisians, the murder of Charlie Hebdo staff and two policemen was by no means an “irritant”.
The latest attack by an Islamist group on a democratic society
again pointed out the difference in approach to such events taken by
most members of the general public and some members of the
intelligentsia. To the former, jihadist inspired murder is just jihadist
inspired murder. To some commentators, on the other hand, murderers
have complicated intentions along with motives that appear other than
what they are. Still others decline to call a jihadist a jihadist.
On
early Thursday morning news broke in Australia on the latest terrorist
attack in France. In Sydney, ABC Radio 702 issued the following tweet:
“Waking up and learning of the overnight violence in Paris? Here’s some
of the history of Charlie Hebdo.” To which one tweeter responded: “Overnight violence? How about calling it an ‘Islamist terrorist attack’? That’s what it is.”
Follow the link to read the rest.
Also in the Oz today a great piece by Brendon O'Neill:
Western freedom of speech was under attack long before the Paris killings
THE global cry of “Je suis Charlie”
in response to the bloody massacre of satirists and cartoonists in Paris
has been heartening.
From Paris’s Place de la Republique to London’s Trafalgar Square to
the streets of San Francisco, thousands of people have gathered in
silence, holding up pens, in memory of the 12 people killed in the
brutal assault on the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo.
The
pens symbolise the freedom to write, to draw, to express in print what
lurks in one’s mind. An attendee at the gathering in London spoke for
many when he stated simply: “I’m here to support freedom of speech.”
Yet while these quietly angry gatherings have spoken to a deep well of human solidarity, they also feel a little too late.
For
the ideal of freedom of speech has been under assault for years in the
West, battered by law and by mobs and by super-sensitive cliques of
offence-takers, everywhere from France to Britain, Scandinavia, the US
and Australia.
And it has been in part this silent war on free speech, and
particularly the institutionalisation of the crazy idea that it is bad
to offend people’s sensibilities, that has encouraged Islamists to think
they have the right to stamp out Mohammed-reviling material.
Follow the link to read the rest.