This weekend Radio National's AWAYE segment featured a tribute to Kunmanara Lester who died recently, aged 75.
The commission reports the following medical evidence in relation to Lester's Blindness (P.191):
6.4.79 Dr David Tonkin first saw Lester on 6 August 1965,
[RC 552, p. 2].
In 1983, based on his own examinations of Lester,
and other records which were available, Tonkin concluded that
Lester had:
1. a long history of red, sore eyes since childhood
(there is evidence of trachoma scarring inside the
lids)
2. blindness since the age of 14 years, following
ulcers during a severe attack of measles (presumably
when the sight in the right eye was lost)
3. loss of the left eye in 1957, the eye having been
blind for nine years previously.
'The findings in the right eye, both before and during
surgery, indicate a long-standing history of infection
(trachoma), with dense (total) corneal scarring, iris
adhesions, and cataract changes following a severe
corneal ulceration which had perforated. Although severe, such ocular manifestations are
recognised complications of trachoma, and in this
instance they were possibly accentuated by measles. I
[RC 552, p.2]
Oddly Point 3 suggest that Lester was blind in his left eye 5 years prior to the tests. Which seems to contradict Lester's own evidence:
6.4.76 Yami Lester, who was at Wallatinna when the Black Mist
incident occurred, and who was aged about 12 at the time,
attributes his blindness to the incident. Describing the mist,
and how it made people ill, he said
'When people first got sick my eyes got sore. I
couldn't open my eyes. I got diarrhoea and a rash on
my skin. I remember when this happened my mother asked
me to stay in the shade. Because I couldn't see I was
led around with a stick like a digging stick. You hold
it at one end and the person walking ahead of you holds
the other end and you follow along. I didn't have the
stick for long, I don't reckon it was even a week. My
left eye sort of came good again so I threw away the
stick but my right eye was permanently blind after
that. I could see with my left eye but it gave me a
lot of trouble. I could not see 100% wi th my left
eye.' [AB 11, pp.6-7]
6.4.77 Lester went on to say that he lost the sight of his
left eye in 1957 [AB 11, p.8].
The commission also looked at the potential interacting effects of trachoma and measles with low-level doses
of radiation but could make no firm findings based on lack of evidence or relevant studies.
In the end the commission made the following conclusions: in regard to fall out at Wallatinna and Lester's blindness:
Conclusions
6.4.92
(a) The differences in the details of Aboriginal accounts
of the Black Mist are to be expected after the passage of over
thirty years. The accounts are sufficiently consistent in
general for them to have credibility.
(b) An oral history of the Black Mist existed for many
years before the incident became known to the general public.
(c) Meteorological, mathematical and statistical modelling
indicates that a black mist passing over Wallatinna and Welbourn
Hil1 could have happened.
(d) There is no reason to disbelieve Aboriginal accounts
that the Black Mist occurred and that it made some people sick.
Both radiation exposure and fear can lead to vomiting. At
Wallatinna, the vomiting by Aborigines may have resulted from
radiation. It may have been a psychogenic reaction to a
frightening experience, or it may have resulted from both of
these.
(e) The Royal Commission believes that Aboriginal people
experienced radioactive fallout from Totem 1 in the form of a
black mist or cloud at and near Wallatinna. This may have made
some people temporarily ill. The Royal Commission does not have
sufficient evidence to say whether or not it caused other
illnesses or injuries.
(f) Given the historical uncertainties and the current
state of scientific knowledge, the evidence presented does not
enable the Royal Commission to decide one way or the other
whether the Black Mist caused or contributed to the blindness of
Yami Lester.
From the Conclusions and recommendations report:
99. Given the historical uncertainties and the current
state of scientific knowledge, the evidence presented does not
enable the Royal Commission to decide one way or the other
whether the Black Mist caused or contributed to the blindness of
Yami Lester. (6.4.92-)
It seems the truth is a little more complicated than the picture painted by the ABC.
Reply from ABC complaints 24/8/2017. Seems they are willing to ditch the truth.
Thank you for your email regarding RN’s AWAYE! ‘We don’t dream’: a tribute to Kunmanara Lester.
In accordance with the ABC's complaints handling procedures, your correspondence has been referred to Audience and Consumer Affairs, a unit separate to and independent of the content making areas of the ABC. Our role is to review and, where appropriate, investigate complaints alleging that ABC content has breached the ABC's editorial standards. The ABC's editorial standards can be found here: http://about.abc.net.au/reports-publications/code-of-practice/.
Audience and Consumer Affairs have reviewed the piece and assessed the contents against the ABC’s editorial standards for accuracy which states, relevantly, in part 2.2: Do not present factual content in a way that will materially mislead the audience. In some cases, this may require appropriate labels or other explanatory information.
The segment was designed to be an obituary for Mr Lester and not a news article considering the possible causes of his blindness or, as you have suggested, an investigation about eye health in Aboriginal communities.
The ABC has covered many aspects of Emu Fields and Maralinga over the years including extensive coverage of the McClelland Royal Commission.
The McClelland Royal Commission, while noting the various complexities surround a determination on the cause of Mr Lester’s blindness, did not make a determination on whether or not the Black Mist caused or contributed to Mr Lester’s blindness because of “historical uncertainties and the current state of scientific knowledge.”
We would further note, that while the report does quote Dr David Tonkin stating, based on his examination of Mr Lester, that he believed that trachoma and measles played a part in Mr Lester losing his eyesight, the report also stated that Dr Tonkin “has no expert knowledge of radiation. Tonkin’s views on Lester’s blindness assumed a direct radiation injury. He [Tonkin] did not profess to have made a study of the potential interacting or synergistic factors to which Pochin later addressed himself.”
Throughout his life, and as noted in the AWAYE! piece, Mr Lester maintained that the Black Mist was responsible for his blindness. And his experience with the Black Mist and the nuclear test formed a basis for his life-long activism.
Audience and Consumer Affairs are satisfied that in an obituary style piece it was appropriate to describe Mr Lester in similar terms to how he described himself. Furthermore, Audience and Consumer Affairs are satisfied that listeners would not be materially misled as to the findings of the McClelland Royal Commission or Mr Lester’s life.
Nevertheless, your comments have been noted by our unit and ABC Radio.
Should you be dissatisfied with this response, you may be able to pursue your complaint with the Australian Communications and Media Authority (www.acma.gov.au).
Thank you for contacting the ABC.
Yours sincerely,
Reena Rihan
Audience and Consumer Affairs
